| | |||
| |||
| Thanks to everyone for their suggestions. I understand that possible step-up basis and marginal tax rates factor in. I will look at these. Frank "Gene E. Utterback, EA" <eagent[at]alliancetax.com> wrote in message news:<zv73b.41$ib4.46991[at]news.uswest.net> ... - quote - > "FranksPlace2" <franksplace2[at]email.com> wrote in message > news:d6bbed5b.0308250924.5ba6ff0d[at]posting.google.com... > > I plan to retire in about a year and start withdrawing my savings and > > retirement money for expenses. I don't expect my tax rate to go down > > as now I will have a lot more time to spend money. > > > I have always planned to use my aftertax savings first; they will last > > about 18 months. Afterwards I will draw on my tax deferred accounts. > > My rule is always defer taxes. > > > Recently an advisor suggested I draw on the tax deferred acounts > > first, reserving the aftertax money. I did not understand why. > > > Why would that be better? > > > Frank > > First, you should ask your advisor what his reasoning is, then see if you > agree with it. > Depending on the facts and circumstances of the case at point, it can be > advantageous to draw on the deferred money earlier if doing so will get some > of it taxed at a lower rate. You didn't mention specifics, so I'll make > some up - Let's suppose you need $5,000 per month to live on, will be 69 > this year, and are single with no dependents and don't itemize. You have > $90,000 in after tax investments and $500,000 in tax deferred investments. > 1st year - you live on the after tax investments of $60K and have no tax > bill. > 2nd year - you live half on tax deferred investments of $30K and pay > approximately $2900 in Federal tax. Your marginal bracket is 15% > from the 3rd year on - you live on $60K in deferred investments and pay > approximately $10,150 in Federal tax. Your marginal bracket is 27% > So for a 6 year period you'd have the following taxes: > Year 1 - $0 > Year 2 - $2,900 > Year 3 - $10,150 > Year 4 - $10,150 > Year 5 - $10,150 > Year 6 - $10,150 > Total - $43,500 > Had you split your needs between thx deferred and after tax investments you > may have had the following: > 6 Years of $15K in after tax money used and $45K in deferred money used - > result is $36,150 in taxable income with tax of $6,100 due in each year. > Times 6 years = $36,600 in total taxes. > OR about $6,900 less than if you followed your rule to always defer taxes. > Of course, this example does not take into account all of the details of > your particular situation and this forum was not intended for such. The > point is this, there can be times when it is better accelerate taxable > income if doing so can keep more of your money in a lower effective tax > bracket. > Good luck, > Gene E. Utterback, EA |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| "FranksPlace2" <franksplace2[at]email.com> wrote in message news:d6bbed5b.0308250924.5ba6ff0d[at]posting.google.com... - quote - > I plan to retire in about a year and start withdrawing my savings and
First, you should ask your advisor what his reasoning is, then see if you> retirement money for expenses. I don't expect my tax rate to go down > as now I will have a lot more time to spend money. > I have always planned to use my aftertax savings first; they will last > about 18 months. Afterwards I will draw on my tax deferred accounts. > My rule is always defer taxes. > Recently an advisor suggested I draw on the tax deferred acounts > first, reserving the aftertax money. I did not understand why. > Why would that be better? > Frank agree with it. Depending on the facts and circumstances of the case at point, it can be advantageous to draw on the deferred money earlier if doing so will get some of it taxed at a lower rate. You didn't mention specifics, so I'll make some up - Let's suppose you need $5,000 per month to live on, will be 69 this year, and are single with no dependents and don't itemize. You have $90,000 in after tax investments and $500,000 in tax deferred investments. 1st year - you live on the after tax investments of $60K and have no tax bill. 2nd year - you live half on tax deferred investments of $30K and pay approximately $2900 in Federal tax. Your marginal bracket is 15% from the 3rd year on - you live on $60K in deferred investments and pay approximately $10,150 in Federal tax. Your marginal bracket is 27% So for a 6 year period you'd have the following taxes: Year 1 - $0 Year 2 - $2,900 Year 3 - $10,150 Year 4 - $10,150 Year 5 - $10,150 Year 6 - $10,150 Total - $43,500 Had you split your needs between thx deferred and after tax investments you may have had the following: 6 Years of $15K in after tax money used and $45K in deferred money used - result is $36,150 in taxable income with tax of $6,100 due in each year. Times 6 years = $36,600 in total taxes. OR about $6,900 less than if you followed your rule to always defer taxes. Of course, this example does not take into account all of the details of your particular situation and this forum was not intended for such. The point is this, there can be times when it is better accelerate taxable income if doing so can keep more of your money in a lower effective tax bracket. Good luck, Gene E. Utterback, EA |
| Tags |
| monies |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Claim Education Cr AND Tuition Deduct - for different Monies? xzebra06@aol.com: In the 2006 case where a below phase-out taxpayer pays out-of-pocket $14k of qualifying tuition for the same dependent-student (and all other... | Taxes | 1 | 02-18-2007 11:14 AM | |
| my w2 gross earnings do not include any monies rayb: I just noticed that my w2 gross earnings do not include any monies that went into what the payroll girl calls a cafiteria plan. It is for any... | Taxes | 11 | 04-01-2005 07:47 AM | |
| Divorce with Retirement Monies Ekaine Turner Grey: About fifteen years ago, my husband of 30 years and I divorced. As part of the divorce decree, I was to receive part of his retirement monies. ... | Taxes | 1 | 01-25-2005 05:51 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |