|
#5
| |||
| |||
| paminof wrote: - quote - > The employer is a large bank, my wife's rollover is a drop I the
I remember the first rollover I did, from my first 401k, where the> bucket for them, so I doubt that the distribution would affect the > existing plan participants. I have a loss of interest and opportunity > cost. The mutual fund at Vanguard has gained 1.5% during the last > week. I didn't think it was legal for anyone to hold your money > without paying interest. At the very least they could say to me, > "we're holding the funds in an account for you and you'll receive > interest for X number of days until the funds are wired." I could > file in Small Claims Court, here in Mass the maximum is $2,000 account "would have gone up" something like $900 during the transfer delay. After another, say, 30 years of investment that's a lot of money. But I found out that there's not much to be done about it. The custodian is allowed some time to make the distribution, and it's more than just a few days (and more than a few weeks I believe). You can complain to the DoL at a certain point but unless they're doing something inappropriate with the funds I don't think you'd get very far. I've seen a big range from plan to plan. I usually figure on a month from initial submission of paperwork to having the money in the destination account, including all delays during the process. Occasionaly it takes longer, rarely is it a lot shorter. If a client has a large amount to rollover I consider doing it in batches so that a large sum doesn't remain uninvested at any given time. I think though you'll find that market fluctuation will work both for you and against you. Not that you want to game this too much, but it's entirely possible that by the time you have the money (or shortly thereafter) the market will be flat, or even down - in which case it worked in your favor. -Tad |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| paminof wrote: - quote - > The employer is a large bank, my wife's rollover is a drop I the
Not for one person, but if you multiply the cost times the number of> bucket for them, so I doubt that the distribution would affect the > existing plan participants. distributions in a year and the number of years, there's a cost that has to be borne by somebody if you use more expensive means of distribution (which would include "fast track" distributions). And you have the weight of the fact that more people are staying than leaving--so imposing the extra cost on the plan itself burdens the remaining participants. - quote - > I have a loss of interest and opportunity
True--but the plan has a very real cost of handling the distributions.> cost. Again, the plan is entitled to balance these rights. And, so long as the dealy is not *unreasonable* you aren't going to have a case. - quote - > The mutual fund at Vanguard has gained 1.5% during the last
I guess the question is why not? Heck, the bank does that with my any> week. I didn't think it was legal for anyone to hold your money > without paying interest. number of regular checking accounts. Again, it's a balancing act issue and *reasonable* time periods are not a problem. Now, if we start talking about waiting two months, the issue has changed. But let's remember it's the *plan* and not the *employer* that has the funds in this case--so any benefit is going to the remaining plan participants. - quote - > At the very least they could say to me,
Won't work--ERISA preempts state law on this matter. So you'd have to> "we're holding the funds in an account for you and you'll receive > interest for X number of days until the funds are wired." I could > file in Small Claims Court, here in Mass the maximum is $2,000 file your case in the appropriate federal district court. The state court has no jurisdiction in the matter, and the first thing counsel for the plan would do is file to move the case to federal court and then move to have the case dismissed--and would certainly win on the first point, and almost certainly would win on the second with the facts you've given. If you wanted to pursue a complaint, the smartest move would be to go to the US Department of Labor (who does have jurisdiction). But don't be surprised if they aren't too excited on this issue. You need much more extreme facts than you have here. --- Ed Zollars, CPA Phoenix, Arizona |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Get out the plan documents or if your lucky its on-line and look at the redemptions requirements. If this is an ESOP they maybe restricted to certain times of the month to buy and sell. "paminof" <nGbZRS3BtySuN_remove_[at]att.net> wrote in message news:3f130bf6.306781[at]netnews.worldnet.att.net... - quote - > I'm doing a direct rollover of my wife's 401(k) from the employer's > plan to a traditional IRA at Vanguard. The 401(k) consists of 3 > mutual funds and a single stock. They've liquidated the mutual funds > last Wednesday July 9th (total value $300K+) but they haven't > sold/settled on the stock yet -- a bank stock. They've agreed to wire > the funds to Vanguard, but are unable to tell me exactly WHEN. The > money is now in limbo for 4 days, it's not invested and I'm not > collecting interest. Is the employer's 401(k) plan allowed to do > this? Should I file claims against them? |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Thanks Ed, I read your posts quite regularly. Some bulletin boards show the number of hits on each post. If they did this in newsgroups you'd find that your posts are very popular and widely read. The employer is a large bank, my wife's rollover is a drop I the bucket for them, so I doubt that the distribution would affect the existing plan participants. I have a loss of interest and opportunity cost. The mutual fund at Vanguard has gained 1.5% during the last week. I didn't think it was legal for anyone to hold your money without paying interest. At the very least they could say to me, "we're holding the funds in an account for you and you'll receive interest for X number of days until the funds are wired." I could file in Small Claims Court, here in Mass the maximum is $2,000 On 15 Jul 2003 02:10:05 GMT, "Ed Zollars, CPA" <ezollar[at]mindspring.com> wrote: - quote - > paminof wrote: > > The > > money is now in limbo for 4 days, it's not invested and I'm not > > collecting interest. Is the employer's 401(k) plan allowed to do > > this? > They would be allowed a reasonable time period to handle this, and they > would not be required to take extraordinary steps to get the money > moved, especially if such steps would cost the plan (and therefore the > remaining participants) money. > > Should I file claims against them? > Well, even assuming four days is unreasonable (and I have serious doubts > a court would that), you'd have to show damages. Since I doubt DOL > would be interested in this issue (they have far bigger fish to fry and > it's not clear at all there's anything actionable here), you'd likely > have to pay for any action on your own. It's not likely the damages are > large enough to pay for virtually *any* costs involved with such a pursuit. > Now, if this drags on for months, your case gets a lot stronger... > -- > Ed Zollars, CPA > Phoenix, Arizona |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| nGbZRS3BtySuN_remove_[at]att.net (paminof) wrote in message news:<3f130bf6.306781[at]netnews.worldnet.att.net> ... - quote - > I'm doing a direct rollover of my wife's 401(k) from the employer's
Yes, I believe they can do this, and no, don't waste your time trying> plan to a traditional IRA at Vanguard. The 401(k) consists of 3 > mutual funds and a single stock. They've liquidated the mutual funds > last Wednesday July 9th (total value $300K+) but they haven't > sold/settled on the stock yet -- a bank stock. They've agreed to wire > the funds to Vanguard, but are unable to tell me exactly WHEN. The > money is now in limbo for 4 days, it's not invested and I'm not > collecting interest. Is the employer's 401(k) plan allowed to do > this? Should I file claims against them? to file claims. I doubt you'll get anywhere. See if you can ask them nicely to release and wire transfer the part that is already in cash. They may tell you no, and you may have to politely, sweetly--but firmly--go up the ladder and insist that in your view, two transfers are better than one. Ultimately, they may still say no. This is often a problem when individual/company stock is involved. http://thetaoofthedow.blogspot.com |
| | |||
| |||
| paminof wrote: - quote - > The
They would be allowed a reasonable time period to handle this, and they> money is now in limbo for 4 days, it's not invested and I'm not > collecting interest. Is the employer's 401(k) plan allowed to do > this? would not be required to take extraordinary steps to get the money moved, especially if such steps would cost the plan (and therefore the remaining participants) money. - quote - > Should I file claims against them?
Well, even assuming four days is unreasonable (and I have serious doubtsa court would that), you'd have to show damages. Since I doubt DOL would be interested in this issue (they have far bigger fish to fry and it's not clear at all there's anything actionable here), you'd likely have to pay for any action on your own. It's not likely the damages are large enough to pay for virtually *any* costs involved with such a pursuit. Now, if this drags on for months, your case gets a lot stronger... -- Ed Zollars, CPA Phoenix, Arizona |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I'm doing a direct rollover of my wife's 401(k) from the employer's plan to a traditional IRA at Vanguard. The 401(k) consists of 3 mutual funds and a single stock. They've liquidated the mutual funds last Wednesday July 9th (total value $300K+) but they haven't sold/settled on the stock yet -- a bank stock. They've agreed to wire the funds to Vanguard, but are unable to tell me exactly WHEN. The money is now in limbo for 4 days, it's not invested and I'm not collecting interest. Is the employer's 401(k) plan allowed to do this? Should I file claims against them? |
| Tags |
| 401k, rollover |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Re: 401K ROLLOVER TO IRA Dick Watson: Sadly, this doesn't clarify. Are you saying that the 401(k) $4,646.57 shouldn't be there anymore and is all in the IRA and why isn't the IRA... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 01-20-2007 02:38 AM | |
| IRA rollover Harlan Lunsford: Speaking of IRA rollover, as Bill was, one of my clients got a notice from IRS wanting 10% on a distribution which was rolloved. there was a code... | Taxes | 3 | 12-09-2006 10:42 AM | |
| Reclassify After Tax IRA rollover to IRA Filtman: In Jan/Feb of 2004 my former employer (I quit in 9/2003) discovered they overpaid my 401K savings plan (for year 2003) by $600. The 401K brokerage... | Taxes | 2 | 04-07-2005 06:55 AM | |
| IRA Rollover Question RAYMOND MORGAN: Ok everyone, I need some help. I have an elderly client who has been forced to take a lump sum distribution from a deferred comp account. He is... | Taxes | 4 | 12-31-2004 02:29 PM | |
| Rollover? Tom G: I don't exactly know how to do perform this action, but here is my problem. I have an IRA which I liquidated, and had the money sent to my... | Microsoft Money | 3 | 11-20-2004 03:43 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |