Go Back   CDN Business Directory > Main Category > Financial Planning

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 07-03-2003, 12:15 PM
Uncle Jack
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Ten year level term cheaper than annual term?

deja_bhoot2000[at]yahoo.com (Bhoot Nath) wrote:

- quote -

> I am a member of American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), which
> provides group insurance plans (life, disability, health, etc.)
> administered by Marsh companies. Life insurance carrier company is New
> York Life.
> What I find amazing is that the premium for 10 year level term is
> LOWER than the premium for annual renewal term. For me (36 years old,
> male, non-smoker, healthy in every other way), the premiums are:
> Annual: (http://www.asceinsurance.com/gtlplan.asp)
> Age 35-39: 3.54/per 10K/per 6 month = $0.708 per 1K, per year
> Age 40-44: 5.22/per 10K/per 6 month = $1.044 per 1K, per year
> Age 45-49: 8.40/per 10K/per 6 month = $1.680 per 1K, per year
> 10 Year Level: (http://www.asceinsurance.com/tytlplan.asp)
> Select rate: $0.59 per 1K, per year (for insurance amounts > 250K)
> Preferred rate: $0.48 per 1K, per year
> (FIXED premium for 10 years)
> All nonsmokers qualify for select; healthy nonsmokers like me qualify
> for preferred. Thinking, that the website was out of date or had a
> typo, I called Marsh. They confirmed all the rates listed above.
> Over the 10 years, annual rates would cost 225% of the 10 year level
> rate. This does not make any sense to me. I would have thought that
> the annual rate would start lower than 10 year level rate and would
> increase over time.
> Is there any fundamental reason why 10 year level term insurance
> should be cheaper than annual renewable term in thea early years? It
> goes against everything I have read.
> I would aprpeciate your comments and insights.
> Bhoot Nath



A couple of comments

Group rates are not necessaraly the lowest. The New York Life Group
term rates I've seen for the major engineering groups tend to be much
higher than individual rates for comprable level term coverage.
They also tend to have low coverage limits.

As for your questions, I expect there are two reasons- Level term is a
hyper-competive product, so they have to compete with the mass
marketers (quotesmith etc) and they expect that level term is somewhat
lapse supported, that is folks don't hold the policies for the full
term so the "surplus" premium over cost of the early years accrues to
the provider when the you drop the policy.

My bottom line advice- find a knowleaglble planner with access to a
wide portfolio of products and discuss your needs with them.

Best regards

Jack Slovic P.E.


  #-1  
Old 07-03-2003, 02:10 AM
Bhoot Nath
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Ten year level term cheaper than annual term?

I am a member of American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), which
provides group insurance plans (life, disability, health, etc.)
administered by Marsh companies. Life insurance carrier company is New
York Life.

What I find amazing is that the premium for 10 year level term is
LOWER than the premium for annual renewal term. For me (36 years old,
male, non-smoker, healthy in every other way), the premiums are:

Annual: (http://www.asceinsurance.com/gtlplan.asp)
Age 35-39: 3.54/per 10K/per 6 month = $0.708 per 1K, per year
Age 40-44: 5.22/per 10K/per 6 month = $1.044 per 1K, per year
Age 45-49: 8.40/per 10K/per 6 month = $1.680 per 1K, per year

10 Year Level: (http://www.asceinsurance.com/tytlplan.asp)
Select rate: $0.59 per 1K, per year (for insurance amounts 250K)
Preferred rate: $0.48 per 1K, per year
(FIXED premium for 10 years)

All nonsmokers qualify for select; healthy nonsmokers like me qualify
for preferred. Thinking, that the website was out of date or had a
typo, I called Marsh. They confirmed all the rates listed above.

Over the 10 years, annual rates would cost 225% of the 10 year level
rate. This does not make any sense to me. I would have thought that
the annual rate would start lower than 10 year level rate and would
increase over time.

Is there any fundamental reason why 10 year level term insurance
should be cheaper than annual renewable term in thea early years? It
goes against everything I have read.

I would aprpeciate your comments and insights.

Bhoot Nath

 

Tags
annual, cheaper, level, ten, term, year
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
Short-term, long-term, spinoff
Michael Stemper: I have held stock in a company for several years, and have augmented my position by participating in their Dividend Re-Investment Program (DRIP)....
Taxes 5 02-05-2007 05:51 AM
Long Term Gain -- Determining Base Price (May not be the correct term)
Patrick: Greetings, (1) In 6/2003, my daughter bought 2 acres or rural land thinking she was going to build on it-- and then sold it in 6/2005 for a...
Taxes 2 02-15-2006 03:38 PM



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:46 AM.